Waking up the American giant

Yesterday, December 7th, marked the infamous 83rd anniversary of the Japanese air raid against Pearl Harbor. This reckless decision would provoke the evaporation of the last isolationist emanations in American public life and pave the way to the Allied victory four years later. But before we got there, a war would need to be fought and waged against a determined and “extremely inflexible” enemy – to use the words of renowned historian James Holland – a favourite of this blog, in case you haven’t noticed.

A few years ago, he wrote a very insightful book in the Ladybird Expert Series about The Pacific War 1941-1943 (Penguin Random House), and I told myself this weekend would be the ideal time to write a few lines about it.

The morning of December 7 was a shocking experience resulting from their underestimation of a lethal nemesis. The Americans took the hit and bounced back. Ultimately, their victory was the result of three crucial ingredients. First, men and resources, which they had in abundance. Second, they had a second-to-none capacity in terms of intelligence, which notably thwarted Admiral Yamamoto’s plan and would ultimately cost him his life. Third, the incomparable leadership of military figures like Admirals Chester Nimitz and William “Bull” Halsey Jr. About the latter, the author evokes that he “gelled immediately” with General Douglas MacArthur – the latter being traditionally a hard-to-get-along figure. Together, “they planned a series of leapfrogging operations, drawing on hard-won experience already gained in the Pacific and on the United States’ burgeoning military might.” Finally, “they were quick to absorb the lessons of war.”

Continue reading “Waking up the American giant”

The Making of Trump 2.0

Historically, the main task of any President-elect in the United States is to form a cabinet. In the last weeks, we have seen a cascade of announcements that have raised some eyebrows. Donald Trump’s picks for key positions in his second administration might seem odd to many.

Not so much if you grab a copy of retired Lieutenant General H. R. McMaster’s insightful book At War with Ourselves: My Tour of Duty in the Trump White House (Harper).

Upon his selection as National Security Advisor by the 45th President, the military general wanted to give his boss the best of his expertise. After consulting with one of his notorious predecessors, Lieutenant General Brent Scowcroft, who masterfully seconded President George H. W. Bush, McMaster understood his role as “making the policy process work and developing options for the president; and second, advising the president with views unalloyed by the departments and their bureaucracies.” The only person that mattered to him was the President, whose foreign policy should be well served. He also perceived his role as being above partisanship. His goodwill would be rewarded with disappointment.

Continue reading “The Making of Trump 2.0”

Behind the scenes in the Sit Room

From Pearl Harbor to the neutralization of Osama bin Laden, every US President is confronted with crises. Any one of them also needs to manage relations with foreign leaders. Hence, a need for an organized mechanism and apparatus to navigate the traffic and make sure that POTUS can take the pulse of the world at a moment’s notice. This is made possible thanks to a vital institution, whose history is brilliantly recounted by former Clinton administration official and ABC host George Stephanopoulos in The Situation Room: The Inside Story of Presidents in Crisis (Grand Central).

Before its establishment, Presidents monitored world events on an ad hoc basis. For any military history enthusiast, the depiction of Franklin D. Roosevelt’s wheelchair being pushed in a former billiard room to consult maps pinned on the walls to monitor developments unfolding during World War II is captivating. Like so many other things, John F. Kennedy would be an innovator by creating the Situation Room in light of the 1961 Bay of Pigs disaster. Every one of his successors would rely on this evolving institution to accompany the United States’ presence on the world scene.

The most important takeaway from the book relates to the notion of the “three Ps”. The Situation Room is: 1) a place where information is gathered, processed, analyzed and decided upon; 2) it regroups people who serve the Presidency in a selfless and non-partisan way and; 3) a process revealing how every commander in chief manages the affairs of the world.

Continue reading “Behind the scenes in the Sit Room”

Winning the Battle of Britain

Since the Battle of Britain officially ended on October 31st, 1940, a review of The Battle of Britain by James Holland in the Ladybird Expert Series (Penguin Random House) remains timely in the aftermath of the commemoration of the 84th anniversary of that pivotal episode of World War II on September 15th – just a few days ago.

I might have written it before, but the greatest merit of James Holland’s book in this collection is to offer the reader the most important aspects of the battles he writes about. The Battle of Britain certainly makes no exception to that rule.

Right from the beginning, Adolf Hitler is aware that he needs to knock Britain out of the war, if he is to be successful in his ambitions. The prospects of appeasement decreased as Winston Churchill grew stronger in his role as Prime Minister. After the successful British evacuation at Dunkirk, the feldgrau horde needs to take London by force. But “it would be suicidal to attempt a Channel crossing without command of the skies and sea lanes secure.”

Continue reading “Winning the Battle of Britain”

How Churchill and Dowding saved Britain and the World

“Nothing great will ever be achieved without great men, and men are great only if they are determined to be so”, said Charles de Gaulle – Winston Churchill’s brother in arm during World War II. Resilience is the common thread of Martin Dugard’s new book Taking London: Winston Churchill and the Fight to Save Civilization (Dutton).

While de Gaulle escaped France with only 2 suitcases aboard the RAF plane that flew him into history on June 17, 1940, Churchill wasn’t much more gifted politically when he was asked to become Prime Minister a month earlier. The author reminds the reader that he was the second choice to occupy the role and that he had “no political currency beyond his words and beliefs.”

Yet, he had to keep the country – and the free world – safe from the claws of Nazism. Alone. A longtime admirer and promoter of the Royal Navy – which ruled the waves for centuries – Churchill had no choice but to realize that Nelson’s heirs couldn’t save Britain. Along with his legendary courage, the Royal Air Force was his only asset.

Continue reading “How Churchill and Dowding saved Britain and the World”

“Bomber” Harris’ Foresight

At the beginning of the summer, my sons and I were captivated by the riveting Apple TV series Masters of the Air. I was therefore enthusiastic to carry my copy of James Holland’s book The Bomber War (Penguin Random House) in my backpack. Those who follow this blog know how much of a fan I am of this talented author. Full disclosure, I intend to review every one of the books he published in the Ladybird Expert Series.

While air power played a role “in Germany’s rapid victory in Poland” at the very beginning of World War II, the same could not be said in the following chapters of the conflict. “The tiny British island of Malta, for example, was not defeated despite in the spring of 1942 briefly becoming the most bombed place on earth”, writes the incomparable historian.

Continue reading ““Bomber” Harris’ Foresight”

En quête du Débarquement

« La bataille de Normandie n’est pas un sujet vidé. » La plaidoirie de Nicolas Aubin est sans appel. Son livre Le Débarquement, vérités et légendes (Éditions Perrin) l’articule magistralement.

Si vous avez été influencé par « toute une littérature d’après-guerre [qui] a idéalisé l’armée allemande », si vous être preneur de l’argument selon lequel l’échec des troupiers portant le feldgrau est exclusivement redevable au « sommeil de Hitler », si vous pensez que la Résistance a joué un rôle décisif dans l’issue de la bataille de Normandie ou que vous faites partie des nombreux détracteurs du Field Marshal Bernard L. Montgomery, vos certitudes seront déboulonnées.

Dans un livre extrêmement bien ramassé – après tout, il ne fait que 300 pages – l’historien militaire qui collabore à certaines des meilleures publications francophones sur le sujet remet plusieurs ouvrages sur le métier. Avant d’aller plus loin, il m’est toutefois agréable d’ajouter qu’il convoque un style d’écriture invitant qui fait le régal du lecteur. Une chaîne de commandement est « percluse de frictions », les Allemands s’échinent à établir des obstacles pour « déchiqueter » les planeurs alliés et les pièces d’artillerie offrent une « symphonie mortelle » aux adversaires. Le livre gargouille de ces belles tournures qui séduisent l’esprit.

Revenons maintenant au cœur de son propos et sur quatre points rapides sur lesquels je me permets d’attirer votre attention.

pourusivre la lecture

Gettysburg en bleu et gris

Gettysburg. Pour l’éternité, le nom est associé à la bataille qui s’est déroulée dans cette bourgade pennsylvanienne de moins de 10 000 habitants au Nord de Washington, D.C. Chaque année, près d’un million de touristes foulent le sol de ce lieu sacré où une « scintillante forêt de baïonnettes » s’engagera au combat durant trois journées fatidiques, du 1er au 3 juillet 1863.

À écouter certains guides et plusieurs historiens, cette bataille fut un point tournant de la guerre de Sécession. Il n’en fut rien. Au soir du dernier jour de la bataille, « rien ne change fondamentalement sur le théâtre d’opérations principal » relate l’historien Vincent Bernard dans le Gettysburg 1863 (Perrin) qu’il consacre à ce moment fort dans l’histoire des États-Unis. Les tuniques grises rassemblées sous le commandement du général Robert E. Lee n’est pas en déroute. Loin d’être effondrée, elle continuera de tirer son épingle du jeu pendant encore près de deux ans.

L’intérêt envers cette bataille n’est pas près de s’estomper. Le discours légendaire qui y fut prononcé quelques mois plus tard par le président Abraham Lincoln a incontestablement contribué à son entrée dans la postérité, puisqu’il fait écho au lourd tribut de sang, de sueur et de larmes consentis par les deux armées en ces journées estivales.

poursuivre la lecture

Coca-Cola and ice cream to defeat Japan

In their seminal book Conflict, which was reviewed here recently, General Petraeus and Lord Roberts posit that, in warfare, “the side that learns and adapts the fastest typically prevails.” An ageless lesson, throughout military history.

As geopolitics evolves, my interest in the Pacific theatre during World War II has increased significantly lately. To prevail against the Empire of the Rising Sun, the US Navy needed to destroy its crucial naval power, which dominated its sphere of influence for five decades. Curtailing Japanese supply lines, notably to deprive its fleet and troops of oil, was instrumental. To that end, American forces would be attacking the islands it occupied. “Capturing these outposts in the middle of the ocean would not only deny them to the Japanese, it would bring the Allied forces closer to Japan itself”, writes renowned military historian James Holland in Victory against Japan 1944-1945, published as part of his insightful contribution to the Ladybird Expert Series (Penguin Random House).

The author also evokes the military ineffectiveness of Chinese Nationalist warlord Chiang Kai-Shek “despite the United States’ two years of ceaseless supplies”, the inestimable contribution of future Marshal Bill Slim and Special Operations Executive (SOE) teams in Burma and the appearance of the B-29 “Superfortress” in the Pacific, “the most expensive single weapons system ever built” up to that point.

Continue reading “Coca-Cola and ice cream to defeat Japan”

Entre guerres

Dans les cours de relations internationales qui ont émaillé mes études universitaires, on nous savonnait les oreilles avec cette théorie selon laquelle la fin de la Guerre froide marquait la fin de la dominance de la geste militaire, du moins comme nous la connaissions jusque-là.

Le fracas des armes appartenait à une période révolue. Il fallait désormais composer avec « l’invention d’un nouveau concept d’opération militaire dont nous allions avoir le redoutable privilège d’inaugurer les contradictions insolubles », « l’intervention humanitaire », pour emprunter les mots utilisés par le général français François Lecointre (retraité) dans son livre Entre guerres (Gallimard).

De l’Irak à la Bosnie, en passant par le Rwanda et Djibouti – pour ne citer que quelques théâtres d’opérations – celui qui sera appelé à occuper la fonction de chef d’état-major des armées françaises entre 2017 et 2021 est issu d’une famille ayant contribué aux belles pages de l’histoire militaire française. Né en 1962, année de la crise de missiles à Cuba, la carrière de François Lecointre correspond à une période durant laquelle l’on croit que l’odeur du cambouis passe au second plan.

poursuivre la lecture